<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why we should abandon the Kyoto Protocol and aim higher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecopolity.com/2009/10/09/why-we-should-abandon-the-kyoto-protocol-and-aim-higher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecopolity.com/2009/10/09/why-we-should-abandon-the-kyoto-protocol-and-aim-higher/</link>
	<description>Politics, Climate Change, Digital Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:47:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ecopolity &#187; Climate diplomacy: Copenhagen versus Kyoto</title>
		<link>http://www.ecopolity.com/2009/10/09/why-we-should-abandon-the-kyoto-protocol-and-aim-higher/comment-page-1/#comment-3953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecopolity &#187; Climate diplomacy: Copenhagen versus Kyoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecopolity.com/?p=316#comment-3953</guid>
		<description>[...] name says, a legal framework, not an operational treaty. The legal operational instrument is the Kyoto Protocol, signed on December, 11, 1997, but coming into force only on 16, February, 2005. The U.S. has never [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] name says, a legal framework, not an operational treaty. The legal operational instrument is the Kyoto Protocol, signed on December, 11, 1997, but coming into force only on 16, February, 2005. The U.S. has never [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
